Further vaccine info

I receive a lot of information, but with the censorship that is currently occurring, with regard anything that goes against the governments agenda, many of the articles have disappeared when I try and return to them.

I have managed to put together some further information with regard the vaccine, some of the links I have included may not lead to the articles, by the time that you read them, but I have actually copied a couple.

One article that I was unable to find again was connected to the MRNA gene therapy technology, as it cannot be called a vaccine, affects a persons DNA and the 'god particle' disconnecting them the Creator. It is annoying that I cannot find this again, as my work is around an individuals connection to source and that the success of Agenda 21/30 is very much about disconnecting people from their spirit.

But anyway, some information for you to consider.

It is assumed by many people getting a vaccination that it is going to protect them from some sort of pathogen and that by doing so you are doing your bit for public health to protect other people. It would also seem that generally people believe that the governments and the health service have their best interests at heart and do not want to believe that they could have another agenda.

A vaccine by definition is a product that stimulates the persons immune system to produce immunity to a specific disease. What is being called a Covid vaccination is NOT a vaccination. It is a gene therapy technology. It cannot be mandated as a vaccine.

It is a synthetic fragment embedded into a fat carrier which is introduced into a cell, not to induce protection from an infection, not to block transmission, but to lessen symptoms of an illness with an SI spike protein, not even Covid itself.

Covid has not been isolated, in spite of many media claims.

The UK Government have admitted that it has not been isolated.

Scientists are realising that claims of the COVID-19 virus having been isolated and proven to exist are based on a made-up definition of “virus-isolation.”

In his latest article, Saeed Qureshi PhD, a former senior scientist at Health Canada, calls out the fakery and reveals what more experts are now confirming world wide. We have been scammed.

Dr Qureshi writes on his blog the following analysis to clear up the lies and confusion on this issue:

During a discussion on LinkedIn with one of the microbiologists, I came to know how they described virus isolation, which is as follows:

“A virus isolate is a virus isolated from an infected host. The process is called “isolation,” which separates viruses from the hosts.”

It means that for microbiologists and virologists, taking a swab sample, which separates virus from the host, is considered as “virus isolation.”

This interpretation does not reflect the correct meaning and understanding of the subject of isolation. But, they imply and promote the true meaning of the process of isolation, i.e., to obtain something by extraction, purification, and identification, reflected by well-known pretty pictures of the DNA/RNA, proteins, and viruses such as a spherical body with spikes (aka coronavirus).

The virologists’ version of the definition is incorrect and causing the problem. Wherever one looks for the virus, one always finds a suffix with it, e.g., “virus isolate,” “virus culture,” “virus lysate,” etc., (which are soups, mixtures or gunks), never “virus” alone; however, it is presented and promoted as pure “virus.”

The Made-Up Definition Of “Virus-Isolation” Makes The Story Of The SARS-CoV-2 Virus, Its Infection, And Pandemic Very Clear, I.E., Nothing Is Real About Them, But All Are Fake. No One Has Seen The Virus, Found It, Or Isolated It As Claimed. It Is All Bogus.

People might ask, then what about the PCR tests, DNA/RNA sequences, protein structures, etc.? They are all reflections of rituals, ignorantly using highly sophisticated and costly chemistry equipment, to make people believe science is being followed. However, nothing is real or relates to the virus.

To conduct such experiments accurately, scientists/technicians must-have reference samples or standards to calibrate the equipment and validate the tests. The reference standards can only come from independently isolated and thoroughly characterized pure virus.

However, as the pure virus has never been isolated, one cannot have reference standards and calibrators; hence all the claimed experimentation becomes scientifically null and void, reflecting a fraud.

Such requirements are not unique to virus isolation or assessment. These are standard and must requirement, referred to as validation, for product assessment by the authorities, such as FDA and USP. It is impossible to get products approved for marketing without this validation step. However, validation of tests and testing for viruses and their components are slipping through the regulatory oversight.

Currently, for the SARS-CoV-2 assessment, the work starts with the assumption that it exists. Without validating the techniques, some experiments are being conducted following ritualistic steps (SOPs) to generate “data” and pretty pictures to show that it exists. It is hard to believe that such deceptive practices can occur in modern-day science and escape authorities’ scrutiny and audit.

Like the virus’s assumed existence, it is further assumed that the associated disease (COVID-19) exists, is contagious, spreading uncontrollably, and potentially people are dying or will die in large numbers. There is no available scientific evidence to support these claims except counting the false-positive test results, obtained mostly from the non-validated and false, PCR test.

It is important to note that there is no scientific evidence showing that SARS-CoV-2 is causing the illness. It cannot be shown because the virus (SARS-CoV-2) is neither available nor exists, as noted above. Hence, its link to the disease cannot be established. It would be safe to confirm now that the COVID-19 is a hoax.

Therefore, considering the current flawed science practices, it becomes a fact that anyone diagnosed with COVID-19 should be regarded as a misdiagnosed case, and accordingly, the incorrect corresponding follow-up treatments.

Physicians need to examine patients without considering the presence of COVID-19 in all cases. They should be challenging the current “scientific” rationale of the COVID-19 diagnosis rather than following the media’s narrative or provided SOPs.

Patients who take a longer time to recover or died with COVID-19 diagnosis could very well be because of misdiagnosis and, by extension, mistreatment or no treatment (e.g., extended quarantine or isolation without treatment).

Similarly, as the virus does not exist, vaccine administration and development become irrelevant; hence, they need to discontinue.

So, a vaccine is a product that stimulates the persons immune system to produce immunity to a specific disease, but they haven’t isolated the virus which it supposedly protects you from and on top of that they are now claiming that there are new versions of the virus.